Title: A comparative study of two evaluation techniques in Community Medicine: Structured Viva – Voce examination versus Traditional Viva examination
Keywords:
Key words: Structured Viva –Voce examination, Traditional Viva examination.Abstract
ABSTRACT:
Introduction:
Assessment and evaluation is an integral part of medicine. Viva-voce examination is one of the methods of assessment in medicine. Viva examination is very important as all domains can be tested. The present study is carried out to compare between traditional viva examination and structured viva examination.
Material and methods:
Study design: Qualitative Research study was conducted on VIIth semester students in the formative assessment.
A Pretested, Structured Designed Questionnaire was prepared.
The response of the students on 5 point likert scale was taken after the traditional viva and structured viva examination.
Results:
Total students examined with the structured viva examination were 52.
Student’s response was taken on 5 point likert scale after traditional viva method and structured viva examination. The chi square test is applied to each question to compare with traditional and structured viva voce examination.
Feeling anxiety when facing examiners, Impact of prior impression of student, Appearance of student has effect, first or last roll numbers of the students, each examiner having different scoring system, examiner’s mood while assessing the traditional and structured viva examination were found to be statistically significant.
Discussion: Structured viva examination can overcome the limitations of traditional viva method provided that the cards should be prepared in such a way that all topics to be covered and difficulty level of questions is equal.
References
References:
Guilbert JJ. Educational Handbook for Health Personnel; 6th Edition; Geneva: World
Health Organization; 1987.
Sharmila Torke, Reem Rachel Abraham, K. Ramnarayan K Asha; The Impact of Viva –Voce Examination on students’ performance in theory component of the final summative examination in Physiology; Journal of Physiology and Pathophysiology Vol. 1(1)pp. 10-12, April 2010.
Holloway PJ, Hardwick JL, Morris J, Start KB (1967). The validity of
essays and viva voce examining techniques. Br. Dental J. 123: 227-32.
Roy, U Tekur, S Prabhu; A comparative study of two evaluation techniques in pharmacology practicals: Conventional practical examination versus objective structured practical examination; Indian Journal of pharmacology Dec 2004; Vol36/ Issue 6 / 385-389.
Wakeford R, Southgate L, Wass V (1995). Improving oral examinations:selecting, training, and monitoring examiners for the MRCGP.BMJ 311: 931-935.
Newble D, Cannon R (1987). A handbook for medical teachers. 2nd edn.
a. Lancaster: MTP Press.
Thomas CS, Mellsop G, Callender J, Crawshaw J, Ellis PM, Hall A, et al (1993). The oral examination: a study of academic and non-academic factors. Med. Educ. 27: 433-439.
Holloway PJ, Hardwick JL, Morris J, Start KB (1967). The validity of essays and viva voce examining techniques. Br. Dental J. 123: 227-32
Muzzin LJ, Hart L (1985). Oral examinations In: Neufeld VR, Norman GR, eds. Assessing clinical competence. New York: Springer Publishing Company pp. 71-93.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 MMJ - A Journal by MIMER Medical College, Pune, India

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.